<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the (dis)appearance of God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/</link>
	<description>spiritual awakening and enlightenment in today&#039;s world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 03:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-21911</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-21911</guid>
		<description>Well, Mike, it is consonant I think, with the more apophatic mystical approaches; for example, the Eastern Orthodox have a teaching that we can only know God through his &quot;energies,&quot; and that the *essence* of God is completely beyond human understanding. 

I do feel something, but now it&#039;s more like an energy than a presence, and it&#039;s internal, not external.

As to the question does this invalidate some of my previous views of spirituality, I guess I&#039;d have to say yes and no. 

Yes to the extent that previous words, concepts, and images no longer really resonate.  Words like &quot;Christian,&quot; &quot;Catholic,&quot; &quot;Trinity,&quot;&quot;Heaven,&quot;&quot;Buddhist,&quot; etc. seem kind of like a distant memory. 

But No, because I&#039;ve known for a long time that &lt;a href=&quot;http://frimmin.com/faith/belief.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it&#039;s not about belief&lt;/a&gt;, and I&#039;ve tried to not believe in my beliefs too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mike, it is consonant I think, with the more apophatic mystical approaches; for example, the Eastern Orthodox have a teaching that we can only know God through his &#8220;energies,&#8221; and that the *essence* of God is completely beyond human understanding. </p>
<p>I do feel something, but now it&#8217;s more like an energy than a presence, and it&#8217;s internal, not external.</p>
<p>As to the question does this invalidate some of my previous views of spirituality, I guess I&#8217;d have to say yes and no. </p>
<p>Yes to the extent that previous words, concepts, and images no longer really resonate.  Words like &#8220;Christian,&#8221; &#8220;Catholic,&#8221; &#8220;Trinity,&#8221;"Heaven,&#8221;"Buddhist,&#8221; etc. seem kind of like a distant memory. </p>
<p>But No, because I&#8217;ve known for a long time that <a href="http://frimmin.com/faith/belief.php" rel="nofollow">it&#8217;s not about belief</a>, and I&#8217;ve tried to not believe in my beliefs too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-21788</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-21788</guid>
		<description>Hey Jon, this is all very interesting. I&#039;m wondering if this realization invalidates some/any of your previous views on spirituality. I&#039;ve been reading your site for a couple years and find it beautiful and encouraging. But the realization you&#039;re talking about doesn&#039;t seem to be compatible with a mystical approach, which to me basically means that you are trying to know God as directly as possible. Is it possible to know something that isn&#039;t a presence? I guess my question is, is mysticism a thing of the past for you now?

I&#039;m just curious. I do experience God as a presence and can&#039;t imagine any religious or spiritual approach that doesn&#039;t in some way aim toward connecting with that presence. But I&#039;m not interested in pushing one approach as right or wrong. My experience is that the moment you take up one view as right or wrong, the divine comes along and lets you know you don&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; just yet.

Just a few various thoughts and questions for you.

Great site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jon, this is all very interesting. I&#8217;m wondering if this realization invalidates some/any of your previous views on spirituality. I&#8217;ve been reading your site for a couple years and find it beautiful and encouraging. But the realization you&#8217;re talking about doesn&#8217;t seem to be compatible with a mystical approach, which to me basically means that you are trying to know God as directly as possible. Is it possible to know something that isn&#8217;t a presence? I guess my question is, is mysticism a thing of the past for you now?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious. I do experience God as a presence and can&#8217;t imagine any religious or spiritual approach that doesn&#8217;t in some way aim toward connecting with that presence. But I&#8217;m not interested in pushing one approach as right or wrong. My experience is that the moment you take up one view as right or wrong, the divine comes along and lets you know you don&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; just yet.</p>
<p>Just a few various thoughts and questions for you.</p>
<p>Great site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-20327</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-20327</guid>
		<description>Very encouraging! I&#039;ve had similar experiences but living without God&#039;s presence seemed to make me look at things a bit differently. I&#039;m still learning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very encouraging! I&#8217;ve had similar experiences but living without God&#8217;s presence seemed to make me look at things a bit differently. I&#8217;m still learning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19252</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19252</guid>
		<description>Ha, I was thinking of the Cloud just last night!  Synchronity, Margreet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I was thinking of the Cloud just last night!  Synchronity, Margreet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margreet</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19251</link>
		<dc:creator>Margreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19251</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;ve been trying to say with words that fall lightyears short of what I mean, is reflected in today&#039;s liturgy. Job speaks about a Person who commands the Universe. For most of us it is rather difficult to &quot;speak to God&quot; if we do not envision God as a Person, our most intimate friend who accepts us totally and pays the ultimate price to set us free. I see this as a metaphor for something else I can&#039;t express in words. Job did it a lot better than me. 

Direct link to mp3 of a prayer on the liturgy of Oct. 1, Jesuit method of prayer
http://www.pray-as-you-go.org/mp3/PAYG_081001.mp3

I very much like &quot;The Cloud of Unknowing&quot;, the Zen of Christianity which is finding expression in &quot;Centering Prayer&quot; in the modern world.

&quot;Our intense need to understand will always be a powerful stumbling block to our attempts to reach God in simple love [...] and must always be overcome. For if you do not overcome this need to understand, it will undermine your quest. It will replace the darkness which you have pierced to reach God with clear images of something which, however good, however beautiful, however Godlike, is not God.&quot; - The Cloud of Unknowing -author unknown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve been trying to say with words that fall lightyears short of what I mean, is reflected in today&#8217;s liturgy. Job speaks about a Person who commands the Universe. For most of us it is rather difficult to &#8220;speak to God&#8221; if we do not envision God as a Person, our most intimate friend who accepts us totally and pays the ultimate price to set us free. I see this as a metaphor for something else I can&#8217;t express in words. Job did it a lot better than me. </p>
<p>Direct link to mp3 of a prayer on the liturgy of Oct. 1, Jesuit method of prayer<br />
<a href="http://www.pray-as-you-go.org/mp3/PAYG_081001.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://www.pray-as-you-go.org/mp3/PAYG_081001.mp3</a></p>
<p>I very much like &#8220;The Cloud of Unknowing&#8221;, the Zen of Christianity which is finding expression in &#8220;Centering Prayer&#8221; in the modern world.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our intense need to understand will always be a powerful stumbling block to our attempts to reach God in simple love [...] and must always be overcome. For if you do not overcome this need to understand, it will undermine your quest. It will replace the darkness which you have pierced to reach God with clear images of something which, however good, however beautiful, however Godlike, is not God.&#8221; &#8211; The Cloud of Unknowing -author unknown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19242</guid>
		<description>Jacques, What can I say? Some people experience a shift in their experience of God. others apparently don&#039;t. Even the most &quot;apophatic&quot; or Zen-like Christian mystics sometimes use &quot;personal&quot; language.  When I pray, I myself usually use as &quot;personal&quot; a language as anyone.

All I can say, is that the conceptions, pictures, and even experiences we have of God all are incomplete because our attempts to grasp them are with our limited, subjective perception. They should be treasured, yes, but not mistaken for the inexpressibleness of the Mystery that provides every moment of existence.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques, What can I say? Some people experience a shift in their experience of God. others apparently don&#8217;t. Even the most &#8220;apophatic&#8221; or Zen-like Christian mystics sometimes use &#8220;personal&#8221; language.  When I pray, I myself usually use as &#8220;personal&#8221; a language as anyone.</p>
<p>All I can say, is that the conceptions, pictures, and even experiences we have of God all are incomplete because our attempts to grasp them are with our limited, subjective perception. They should be treasured, yes, but not mistaken for the inexpressibleness of the Mystery that provides every moment of existence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19234</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19234</guid>
		<description>I hear you Jon, but I&#039;m still struggling with understanding this in a completely non-personal way. I mean where does PERSONality come from if not as a manifestation of God. Yes, God&#039;s essence is beyond comprehension and to speak of it is in a sense impossible, but surely God is conscious intelligence and not unconscious. If God is love then God is &quot;a person&quot; not like you and I are persons, but that there exists such a thing as the Mind of God and that in that Mind God chooses intelligently to Love.

I wonder if you have ever come across the writings of James (Jim) Arraj - www.innerexplorations.com He writes extensively on the relationship between Christianity, Eastern Mysticism, Jungian Psychology and other wonderful subjects. 

In some of his writings he discusses the relationship between Hindu/Buddhist encounters of the non-personal Brahman and Christian encounters of God as Loving other. He and others have put forward the proposal that the Hindu/Buddhist experience is the encounter of God as the Ground of Being/Existence. At the point where all of creation is given existence by God they are all One and the same (In a panentheistic way - though I do not state this as well as he does) and so God and Self and everything else is experienced as One - Everything - Nothing. However, this is not the only or even the most important/highest of mystical experiences. Rather, God, experienced as a loving other is the Biblical model of our relationship with God and the experience of most/all Christian mystics even if they do have some nondual experience of God as the Ground of Being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Jon, but I&#8217;m still struggling with understanding this in a completely non-personal way. I mean where does PERSONality come from if not as a manifestation of God. Yes, God&#8217;s essence is beyond comprehension and to speak of it is in a sense impossible, but surely God is conscious intelligence and not unconscious. If God is love then God is &#8220;a person&#8221; not like you and I are persons, but that there exists such a thing as the Mind of God and that in that Mind God chooses intelligently to Love.</p>
<p>I wonder if you have ever come across the writings of James (Jim) Arraj &#8211; <a href="http://www.innerexplorations.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.innerexplorations.com</a> He writes extensively on the relationship between Christianity, Eastern Mysticism, Jungian Psychology and other wonderful subjects. </p>
<p>In some of his writings he discusses the relationship between Hindu/Buddhist encounters of the non-personal Brahman and Christian encounters of God as Loving other. He and others have put forward the proposal that the Hindu/Buddhist experience is the encounter of God as the Ground of Being/Existence. At the point where all of creation is given existence by God they are all One and the same (In a panentheistic way &#8211; though I do not state this as well as he does) and so God and Self and everything else is experienced as One &#8211; Everything &#8211; Nothing. However, this is not the only or even the most important/highest of mystical experiences. Rather, God, experienced as a loving other is the Biblical model of our relationship with God and the experience of most/all Christian mystics even if they do have some nondual experience of God as the Ground of Being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19227</guid>
		<description>Well, Jacques, one way I have of making sense of it is an Eastern Orthodox teaching on the &quot;essence&quot; of God as opposed to the &quot;energies&quot; of God.

All human experience of God is through divine manifestations... the energies of God. These are felt in infinite ways and levels, from admiring the beauty of a sunset, to human love, to the experience of God&#039;s presence in a personal way, even to the hypostases or personae (wrongly translated &quot;persons&quot;) of the Trinity.

The essence of God is what&#039;s behind all the masks. It&#039;s indescribable. Beyond thought or concept. To speak of it is to immediately lie about it. And there it&#039;s neither personal, nor anything else.  But from that infinite Emptiness, &quot;reality&quot; flows.  That is the mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Jacques, one way I have of making sense of it is an Eastern Orthodox teaching on the &#8220;essence&#8221; of God as opposed to the &#8220;energies&#8221; of God.</p>
<p>All human experience of God is through divine manifestations&#8230; the energies of God. These are felt in infinite ways and levels, from admiring the beauty of a sunset, to human love, to the experience of God&#8217;s presence in a personal way, even to the hypostases or personae (wrongly translated &#8220;persons&#8221;) of the Trinity.</p>
<p>The essence of God is what&#8217;s behind all the masks. It&#8217;s indescribable. Beyond thought or concept. To speak of it is to immediately lie about it. And there it&#8217;s neither personal, nor anything else.  But from that infinite Emptiness, &#8220;reality&#8221; flows.  That is the mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19218</guid>
		<description>Do you not think God is personal at all. What about Jesus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you not think God is personal at all. What about Jesus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://frimmin.com/2008/09/17/the-disappearance-of-god/comment-page-1/#comment-19211</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frimmin.com/?p=385#comment-19211</guid>
		<description>Sorry for my delay in responding, Arulba. Things have been a bit busy. I agree, the &quot;non-presence&quot; is definitely OK. The main thing I think is that what I call the &quot;personal metaphor,&quot; the language and perception of God as a &quot;Person,&quot; has completely and forever broken down, and I don&#039;t miss that at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for my delay in responding, Arulba. Things have been a bit busy. I agree, the &#8220;non-presence&#8221; is definitely OK. The main thing I think is that what I call the &#8220;personal metaphor,&#8221; the language and perception of God as a &#8220;Person,&#8221; has completely and forever broken down, and I don&#8217;t miss that at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

